Planners take the question of prosperity seriously, and are constantly looking for ways to measure it. We have to be able to categorize, qualify and quantify “prosperity”. I would put this under the question of “quality of life”. The City Mayors website ranks the world’s cities by quality of life.
The sidebar of the above link tells us that they determine rankings based on the Mercer Worldwide Quality of Living Survey.
Research methodology
Data was largely collected between September and November 2007 and is regularly updated to take account of changing circumstances. In particular, the assessments will be revised in the case of any new developments. The Mercer database contains more than 350 cities, however only 215 cities have been considered for the quality of living 2008 ranking in order to compare from one year to the next. The worldwide rankings are produced from the most recent Worldwide Quality of Living survey, conducted by Mercer. Individual reports are produced for each city surveyed.
Mercer’s study is based on detailed assessments and evaluations of 39 key quality-of-living determinants, grouped in the following categories:
• Political and social environment (political stability, crime, law enforcement, etc)
• Economic environment (currency exchange regulations, banking services, etc)
• Socio-cultural environment (censorship, limitations on personal freedom, etc)
• Health and sanitation (medical supplies and services, infectious diseases, sewage, waste disposal, air pollution, etc)
• Schools and education (standard and availability of international schools, etc)
• Public services and transportation (electricity, water, public transport, traffic congestion, etc)
• Recreation (restaurants, theatres, cinemas, sports and leisure, etc)
• Consumer goods (availability of food/daily consumption items, cars, etc)
• Housing (housing, household appliances, furniture, maintenance services, etc)
• Natural environment (climate, record of natural disasters)
Notice that it’s the Mercer Worldwide “Quality of Living” survey, and not “quality of life”.
I googled Mercer and found this definition. The distinction they make is interesting:
Although Quality of Life is a broadly used term, it should not be confused with what Mercer refers to as Quality of Living. Alongside the different personal and subjective assessments each of us may make, there are some aspects everyone would probably agree on as being important for having good quality of living standards such as personal safety and security, health issues, transport infrastructure, availability of consumer goods and adequate housing and schooling and recreation opportunities.
In fact, Quality of Life may involve a subjective assessment or opinion, whereas Mercer’s criteria are objective, neutral and unbiased. Quality of Life is about a person’s emotional state and personal life. One may live in the highest ranked city in terms of quality of living and still have a very bad quality of life because of unfortunate personal circumstances (illness, unemployment or loneliness, etc).
From looking at Mercer’s “about” page, it appears that they are a human resources company.
Mercer is the global leader for trusted HR and related financial advice, products and services. In our work with clients, we make a positive impact on the world every day. We do this by enhancing the financial and retirement security, health, productivity and employment relationships of the global workforce.
Their objective in quantifying quality of living and ranking cities is to be able to assess how much people should be paid for working in each city. In other words, if you are a multinational corporation, hiring someone, and you want to move that person from one city to another, you need to adjust their salary up or down based on how much of a hardship it is for them to be in the new environment.
Their purpose is to develop criteria to determine compensation of employees. Fascinating.